OT - fanfic meta
Apr. 25th, 2006 09:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Teresa Neilsen Hayden (senior editor at Tor) pwnz those who equate fanfiction with theft. My favorite bit:
In a purely literary sense, fanfic doesn’t exist. There is only fiction. Fanfic is a legal category created by the modern system of trademarks and copyrights. Putting that label on a work of fiction says nothing about its quality, its creativity, or the intent of the writer who created it.
all I can say is, Worddity word WORD!
edited to add
partly_bouncy points to a pager that details the Marion Zimmer Bradley vs. fanfic author story and Teresa (
tnh)herself steps in to respond with a link to the original comment thread/context for the quote I pulled and the entire kerfuffle.
I had a long, involved post written explaining my complicated POV as an author/creator (of fiction and music) and a ficcer/thief, when I realized that I have no desire to start yet another, peripheral kerfuffle and end up on teh wank. There's a place for dispassionate discourse on fandom and this really isn't it. This is a subjective, fannish, squee-filled journal of r3cs. Click to comments and follow the links if you're interested.
Also,
thelastgoodname is leading a thoughtful discussion on the whole March "Why are they playing in my universe?!" THING here.
In a purely literary sense, fanfic doesn’t exist. There is only fiction. Fanfic is a legal category created by the modern system of trademarks and copyrights. Putting that label on a work of fiction says nothing about its quality, its creativity, or the intent of the writer who created it.
all I can say is, Worddity word WORD!
edited to add
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I had a long, involved post written explaining my complicated POV as an author/creator (of fiction and music) and a ficcer/thief, when I realized that I have no desire to start yet another, peripheral kerfuffle and end up on teh wank. There's a place for dispassionate discourse on fandom and this really isn't it. This is a subjective, fannish, squee-filled journal of r3cs. Click to comments and follow the links if you're interested.
Also,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 09:22 pm (UTC)What a creator does is up to them. Based on some of the history, the basic problem seems to be with entitlement issues on both sides or lack of understanding the cultural and historical underpinings of current fan fiction culture. :/
no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 11:39 pm (UTC)That's a brave thing, trying to pin down accounts of the Darkover blowup. In my experience, fans share stories very well -- unless they're talking about some major social cataclysm on the order of this one or Coventry or the '64 Boondoggle, in which case the closer they were to the storm center, the warier they are about discussing it.
Collaborations tend to breed dissatisfaction, and this was a very large collaboration. As Patrick said, what we're seeing is a story about human conflict, not the nature of fanfic.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-26 11:59 pm (UTC)